Main ways to present results
There are really only 2 major ways data/results are generally presented: Tables and figures. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. In most cases, I prefer figures since they are often easier and more intuitive to understand (assuming the figure is done well). However, sometimes tables are the better choice. Being able to make great-looking figures and tables that convey the information you want to convey is a very important skill. You need to make sure that the figure or table is easy to understand, and that it is not misleading. It should be targeted to your audience.
Figures
A well-done figure is able to convey a lot of complex information in an inutitive and understandable format. On the flip side, a poorly thought-out figure can be utterly confusing even if it is presenting something simple. Worse, figures can easily be (ab)used to mislead the reader. Your goal is to make sure that your figures are great-looking, easy to understand and not misleading. We’ll go over some more details relating to figures in subsequent units.
Tables
Tables allow you to easily present summaries of your data. Many epidemiological and other papers have a Table 1 which summarizes the data by its characteristics. For instance if you had a human cohort, this summary table will likely list the number and percentages or ranges of individuals based on gender, age, BMI, smoking status, etc.
Tables are also often used to present results of your data analysis. In my opinion, figures are often better, but if the results are simple or there are a lot of numbers that need to be shown, tables can work better at times. We’ll go over some more details on how to generate tables in R in a subsequent unit.